[1] Niiniluoto, I. (2014). Values in design sciences. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 46, 11-15.
[2] Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of management information systems, 24(3), 45-77.
[3] O'Keefe, R. (2014). Design Science, the design of systems and Operational Research: back to the future?. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 65(5), 673-684.
[4] Simon HA (1969). The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press:Cambridge, MA.
[5] Brown, T. (2008). Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6): 84-93.
[6] Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS quarterly, 28(1), 75-105.
[7] Fuller, R.B., & Kuromiya, K. (1992). Cosmography: A Posthumous Scenario for the Future of Humanity, 1st ed. Macmillan Pub Co, London, UK.
[8] March, S. T., & Smith, G. F. (1995). Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision support systems, 15(4), 251-266.
[9] Pournader, M., Tabassi, A. A., & Baloh, P. (2015). A three-step design science approach to develop a novel human resource-planning framework in projects: the cases of construction projects in USA, Europe, and Iran. International journal of project management, 33(2), 419-434.
[10] Nikolic, I. (2009). Co-evolutionary method for modelling large scale socio-technical systems evolution. TU Delft, Delft University of Technology. Next Generation Infrastructures Foundation.
[11] Gregor, S., & Hevner, A. R. (2013). Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS quarterly, 37(2): 337-355.
[12] Baskerville, R., Pries-Heje, J., & Venable, J. (2009, May). Soft design science methodology. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on design science research in information systems and technology (p. 9). ACM.
[13] March, S. T., & Storey, V. C. (2008). Design science in the information systems discipline: an introduction to the special issue on design science research. MIS quarterly, 32(4): 725-730.
[14] Mingers, J. (2003). A classification of the philosophical assumptions of management science methods. Journal of the operational research society, 54(6), 559-570.
[15] Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2006). Learning for action: a short definitive account of soft systems methodology and its use, for practitioners, teachers and students. John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
[16] Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd enl. ed. University of Chicago Press.
[17] Saunders, M., Philip, L., & Adrian, T. (2009). Research methods for business students. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
[18] Howick, S., & Ackermann, F. (2011). Mixing OR methods in practice: Past, present and future directions. European Journal of Operational Research, 215(3), 503-511.
[19] Van Aken, J. (2005). Management research as a design science:Articulating the research products of Mode 2 knowledge production in management. British Journal of Management, 16(1): 19–36.
[20] Holmström, J., Ketokivi, M., & Hameri, A. P. (2009). Bridging practice and theory: a design science approach. Decision Sciences, 40(1), 65-87.
[21] White, L. (2006). Evaluating problem-structuring methods: Developing an approach to show the value and effectiveness of PSMs. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(7), 842-855.
[22] Hevner, A. R. (2007). A three cycle view of design science research. Scandinavian journal of information systems, 19(2), 4.
[23] Dixon-Woods, M., Cavers, D., Agarwal, S., Annandale, E., Arthur, A., Harvey, J., ... & Riley, R. (2006). Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC medical research methodology, 6(1), 35.
[24] Nunamaker Jr, J. F., Chen, M., & Purdin, T. D. (1991). Systems development in information systems research. Journal of management information systems, 7(3), 89-106.
[25] Purao, S. (2002). Design research in the technology of information systems: Truth or dare. GSU Department of CIS Working Paper, 45-77.
[26] Cole, R., Purao, S., Rossi, M., & Sein, M. (2005). Being proactive: where action research meets design research. ICIS 2005 Proceedings, 27.
[27] Venable, J. (2006, February). The role of theory and theorising in design science research. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Design Science in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST 2006) (pp. 1-18).
[28] Pries-Heje, J., & Baskerville, R. (2008). The design theory nexus. MIS quarterly,32(4): 731-755.
[29] Wieringa, R. (2009, May). Design science as nested problem solving. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on design science research in information systems and technology (p. 8). ACM.
[30] Sein, M., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., & Lindgren, R. (2011). Action design research. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 35(1), 37-56.
[31] Kuechler, W., & Vaishnavi, V. (2012). A framework for theory development in design science research: multiple perspectives. Journal of the Association for Information systems, 13(6), 395.
[32] Gregor, S., & Hevner, A. R. (2013). Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS quarterly, 37(2): 337-355.
[33] Wieringa, R. J. (2014). Design science methodology for information systems and software engineering. London: Springer.
[34] Adams, K.M. (2015). Non-functional Requirements in Systems Analysis and Design, Topics in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (Vol. 28). Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
[35] Creswell, J. 2002. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[36] Mingers, J., & Rosenhead, J. (2001). Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited (Vol. 1). John Wiley and Sons Ltd..
[37] Paterson, B. L., Dubouloz, C. J., Chevrier, J., Ashe, B., King, J., & Moldoveanu, M. (2009). Conducting qualitative metasynthesis research: Insights from a metasynthesis project. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(3), 22-33.
[38] Edwards, J., & Kaimal, G. (2016). Using meta-synthesis to support application of qualitative methods findings in practice: A discussion of meta-ethnography, narrative synthesis, and critical interpretive synthesis. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 51, 30-35.
[39] Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC medical research methodology, 8(1), 45.
[40] Zimmer, L. (2006). Qualitative meta‐synthesis: a question of dialoguing with texts. Journal of advanced nursing, 53(3), 311-318.
[41] Yin, R. K. 2009. Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[42] Mohaghar, A., Ansari, M., Sadeghi Moghadam, M. R. & Mirkazemi Mood, M. (2018). A Meta Synthesis of the Modeling Methods of Complex Socio-technical Systems with a Multi Paradigm-multi Methodology Approach. Industrial Management Journal, 10(2): 247-278
[43] Mohaghar, A., Ansari, M., Sadeghi Moghadam, M. R. & Mirkazemi Mood, M. (2018). A framework to synthesis the modeling methods of. Socio-technical systems using critical interpretive meta synthesis, Industrial Management Perspective Journal, 9(1): 1-24.
)