ارائه مدلی جهت تبیین نظام تصمیم‌گیری در سازمان‌های دولتی استان کردستان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد سنندج، سنندج، ایران

2 استادیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد سنندج، سنندج، ایران،

3 دانشیار،گروه کارافرینی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

4 استادیار گروه مدیریت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد سنندج، سنندج، ایران

چکیده

در عصری که تغییر و تحولات سریع و فزاینده از جمله مشخصات آن است، آهنگ تصمیم‌گیری نیز شرایطی را به وجود آورده که زمان تعامل و تعمق و تصمیم‌گیری را برای مدیران کوتاه نموده است. در واقع مدیران امروزی خود را مجبور به اتخاذ تصمیمات بیشتری در رابطه با موضوع و مسائل متنوع و گسترده‌تری در زمان کوتاه‌تر می‌بینند. از اینرو، هدف این پژوهش ارائه مدلی جهت تبیین نظام تصمیم‌گیری در سازمان‌های دولتی استان کردستان است. پژوهش حاضر توصیفی- همبستگی، از نوع تحقیقات پیمایشی و از جمله پژوهش‌های کاربردی می‌باشد که به صورت میدانی انجام شد. جامعه آماری پژوهش حاضر شامل کلیه مدیران ارشد، مدیران و کارشناسان سازمان‌های دولتی و بالأخص استانداری استان کردستان بودند. که تعداد 358 نفر به عنوان نمونه آماری پژوهش انتخاب گردید. بر اساس یافته‌های مرور ادبیات و مصاحبه با خبرگان سازمان‌های دولتی، تحلیل تم و به‌کارگیری چهار راند روش دلفی، مدل مفهومی نهایی پژوهش شامل 5 بعد اصلی و 76 زیر بعد استخراج گردید. سپس با استفاده از روش مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری مدل اندازه‌گیری اجزای مدل و مدل ساختاری کل مدل اعتبارسنجی شد. بر اساس یافته‌های پژوهش، ابعاد «عوامل فردی (I)»، «عوامل ساختاری و فرآیندی (S)»، «عوامل اجرایی (A)»، «عوامل سازمانی (O)» و «عوامل محیطی (E)» مدل نظام تصمیم‌گیری در سازمان‌های دولتی استان کردستان را تبیین می‌کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Presenting a model to explain the decision-making system in government organizations in Kurdistan province

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad salim Karimi 1
  • Adel Salavati 2
  • Behrouz Zarei 3
  • Kumars Ahmadi 4
1 PhD Student, Department of Public Administration, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj Branch, Sanandaj, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Government Management Group, Islamic Azad University Sanandaj Branch, Sanandaj, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Entrepreneurship Group, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Government Management Group, Islamic Azad University Sanandaj Branch, Sanandaj, Iran.
چکیده [English]

In an era where rapid and increasing change is one of its characteristics, the pace of decision-making has also created conditions that have shortened the time for interaction, reflection and decision-making for managers.In fact, today's managers find themselves forced to make more decisions about a wider variety of issues and problems in a shorter period of time. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to provide a model to explain the decision-making system in government organizations in Kurdistan province. The present research, descriptive-correlational which is of survey research type, is among applied ones that was done as a field study. The population of this research included all senior managers, managers and experts of Government organizations To do the research, 358 persons were chosen as our research Statistical population. Based on the findings of literature review and interviews with experts of government organizations, theme analysis and the use of four rounds of Delphi method, the final conceptual model of the research including 5 main dimensions and 76 sub-dimensions was extracted. Then, using the structural equation modeling method, the model of measuring the components of the model and the structural model of the whole model were validated. Based on the research findings, the dimensions of "individual factors (I)", "structural and process factors (S)", "executive factors (A)", "organizational factors" and "environmental factors (E)" explain the model of the decision-making system in government organizations in Kurdistan province.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • decision-making
  • Decision-Making Models
  • governmental organizations
  • Kurdistan Province’s -Governors Organization
[1] Gorgulho, José, et al. "Governance: Decision-making model and cycle." Procedia Computer Science 64 (2015): 578-585.
[2] Jahanseir Khararoudi, Farzaneh, Adel Azar, and Tooraj Karimi. "Decision-making on dimensions of ambidexterity using an agent-based modeling approach." Modern Research in Decision Making 5.4 (2020): 1-18.
[3] Pamela, Ch. Decisions. Decisions. Journal of Management in Medicine. (1996):10 (6). 43.
[4] Werther Jr, William B., and Keith Davis. "Human resources and personnel management." (1981).
[5] Del Campo, Cristina, et al. "Decision making styles and the use of heuristics in decision making." Journal of Business Economics 86.4 (2016): 389-412.
[6] Dabić, Marina, Darko Tipurić, and Najla Podrug. "Cultural differences affecting decision-making style: a comparative study between four countries." Journal of Business Economics and Management 16.2 (2015): 275-289.
[7] Mosadeghrad, Ali, Maryam Tajvar, and Sara Taheri. "Female managers’ decision-making in healthcare organizations: Challenges and solutions." Modern Research in Decision Making 5.1 (2020): 51-94.
[8] Kargar, Ghulam Ali. The role of information and communication technology in the decision-making process of managers of Iranian sports organizations. Sports Management and Motor Behavior. (2015): 10 (20), 122-111.
[9]. Saadat, Esfandiar. Decision making process in the organization. Tehran: Institute of Printing and Publishing, University of Tehran. (1995).
[10] Daft, Richard L. "Organization theory and design." (2007).
[11] Lane, Jan Erik. "Viešasis sektorius: sąvokos, modeliai ir požiūriai." Vilnius: Margi raštai 461.2 (2001).
[12].Balabonienė, I., &Večerskienė, G. The aspects of performance measurement in public sector organization. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. (2015): 213, 314-320.
[13] Smalskys, Vainius. "Viešojo administravimo modernizavimo priežastys ir tendencijos." Ekonomika ir vadyba: aktualijos ir perspektyvos 1 (2010): 90-100.
[14] Bhatt, Ganesh Datt, and Jigish Zaveri. "The enabling role of decision support systems in organizational learning." Decision Support Systems 32.3 (2002): 297-309.
[15] Mintzberg, H. Planning on the left side, managing on the right. In Leadership Perspectives. (2017). .413-426. Routledge.
[16] Tawse, Alex, Vanessa M. Patrick, and Dusya Vera. "Crossing the chasm: Leadership nudges to help transition from strategy formulation to strategy implementation." Business Horizons 62.2 (2019): 249-257.
 [17] Kaiser, Alexander, et al. "Towards a prioritization of needs to support decision making in organizational change processes." (2018): 4390-4399.
[18] Papulova, Zuzana, and Andrea Gazova. "Role of strategic analysis in strategic decision-making." Procedia Economics and Finance 39 (2016): 571-579.
[19] Reymen, Isabelle MMJ, et al. "Understanding dynamics of strategic decision making in venture creation: a process study of effectuation and causation." Strategic entrepreneurship journal 9.4 (2015): 351-379.
[20] Spraragen, Marc, and Azad M. Madni. "Modeling of emotional effects on decision-making by game agents." Procedia Computer Science 28 (2014): 736-743.
[21] Mueller, Ralph O. Basic principles of structural equation modeling: An introduction to LISREL and EQS. Springer Science & Business Media, 1999.
[22] Ghasemi, Vahid. Structural Equation Modeling in Social Research Using Amos Graphics. Publications Sociologists. (2014).
[23] Poursadegh, Nasser. Investigating the relationship between decision-making styles and competitive advantage in small and medium-sized companies in industrial towns of West Azerbaijan province. Industry and University, (2014). 6 (19-20), 45-33.
[24] Bless, Herbert, and Eric R. Igou. "Mood and the use of general knowledge structures in judgment and decision making." The routines of decision making (2005): 193-210.
[25] Armstrong, Michael, and Angela Baron. Managing performance: performance management in action. CIPD publishing, 2005.