مروری نظام‌مند بر ادبیات تصمیم‌گیری جمعی

نوع مقاله : مقاله مروری

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت تکنولوژی، دانشگاه علم و صنعت، تهران، ایران.

2 استادیار، دانشکده مهندسی پیشرفت، دانشگاه علم و صنعت، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

تصمیم‌گیری جمعی فرآیندی است که گروهی از افراد برای دستیابی به بهبود وضعیت خود از طریق تحقق بخشیدن به هدفشان، در مورد یک مسئله خاص تصمیم واحدی می‌گیرند. تصمیم‌گیری جمعی به عنوان یکی از روش های مهم دستیابی به تصمیم بهینه شناخته می‌شود. هدف از این مقاله، ارائه یک تصویر جامع از ابعاد تصمیم‌گیری جمعی و پاسخ به مجموعه ای از سوالات مرتبط در این زمینه با انجام یک مرور ادبیات نظام‌مند می‌باشد. در این خصوص در قسمت اول، تصمیم‌گیری جمعی معرفی خواهد شد و مراحل پروتکل مرور ادبیات نظام‌مند در 5 مرحله بررسی می‌شود. در قسمت بعد، مهمترین کلمات کلیدی و مهمترین مناطق تحقیق شناسایی می‌شوند و نقشه هم رخدادی واژگان در حوزه تصمیم‌گیری جمعی ترسیم می گردد. در ادامه، سئوالات تحقیق پاسخ داده خواهند شد. در پاسخ به این سئوالات، ضرورت استفاده و نمونه هایی از بکارگیری تصمیم‌گیری جمعی بیان می‌شود. سپس، عوامل مؤثر در تصمیم‌گیری جمعی بررسی شده و چگونگی رسیدن به یک تصمیم جمعی تبیین می‌شود. در آخر، مزایا و معایب تصمیم‌گیری جمعی مطرح می‌شود و روش ها و ابزارهای آن بیان می‌شود. همچنین، مدل‌هایی از تصمیم‌گیری جمعی به عنوان نمونه آورده شده و تحلیلی از نتایج بدست آمده ارائه می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

A Systematic Literature Review of the Collective Decision-Making

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyed Mohsen Mirbagheri 1
  • Ata ollah Rafiei Atani 2
  • Mohammadreza Parsanejad 2
1 PhD Student, Department of Technology Management, University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Progress Engineering, University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Collective decision-making is the process by which a group of people makes a single decision on a particular issue to achieve improvement by realizing their goal. Collective decision-making is known as one of the most important ways to achieve optimal decision-making. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive picture of the dimensions of collective decision-making and to answer a set of related questions in this field via a systematic literature review (SLR). In this regard, in the first part, the collective decision-making will be introduced and the SLR protocol will be examined in 5 steps. In the next section, the most important keywords and areas of research are identified and a co-word analysis map in the field of collective decision-making is drawn for the period between 1990 and March 2021 on the Web of Science. In the following, research questions will be answered. In response to these questions, the need for use and examples of the use of collective decision-making is stated. Then, effective factors in collective decision-making are examined and the way to reach a collective decision is explained. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of collective decision-making are discussed and its methods and tools are described. Also, models of collective decision-making are given as a sample and an analysis of the results is provided.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Collective decision-making
  • Systematic literature review (SLR)
  • Co-words Analysis

مراجع

[1]    T. X. Bui and A. Co-oP, “A group decision support system for cooperative multiple criteria group decision making,” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. Berlin Heidelberg, Ger. Springer-Verlag, 1987.
[2]    B. Wu, X. Zhou, Q. Jin, F. Lin, and H. Leung, “Analyzing Social Roles Based on a Hierarchical Model and Data Mining for Collective Decision-Making Support,” IEEE Syst. J., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 356–365, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2014.2386611.
[3]    A. T. de Almeida-Filho, D. F. de Lima Silva, and L. Ferreira, “Financial modelling with multiple criteria decision making: A systematic literature review,” J. Oper. Res. Soc., pp. 1–19, 2020, doi: 10.1080/01605682.2020.1772021.
[4]    E. Ruschel, E. A. Portela Santos, and E. de F. Rocha Loures, “Industrial maintenance decision-making: A systematic literature review,” J. Manuf. Syst., vol. 45, pp. 180–194, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.09.003.
[5]    H. Alabool, A. Kamil, N. Arshad, and D. Alarabiat, “Cloud service evaluation method-based Multi-Criteria Decision-Making: A systematic literature review,” J. Syst. Softw., vol. 139, pp. 161–188, May 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.01.038.
[6]    J. J. Nájera-Sánchez, “A systematic review of sustainable banking through a co-word analysis,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12010278.
[7]    D. Nguyen, “Mapping knowledge domains of non-biomedical modalities: A large-scale co-word analysis of literature 1987-2017,” Soc. Sci. Med., vol. 233, pp. 1–12, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.044.
[8]    A. I. Prigozhin, “Game Methods of Collective Decision Making in Management Consulting,” Sov. Educ., vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 25–45, Dec. 1991, doi: 10.2753/RES1060-9393331225.
[9]    A. Zafeiris, Z. Koman, E. Mones, and T. Vicsek, “Phenomenological theory of collective decision-making,” Phys. A-STATISTICAL Mech. ITS Appl., vol. 479, pp. 287–298, Aug. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2017.02.026.
[10] T. Bosel, A. Reinal, and J. A. R. Marshall, “Collective decision-making,” Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci., vol. 16, pp. 30–34, Aug. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.03.004.
[11] F. Rossi, “Collective decision making: a great opportunity for constraint reasoning,” CONSTRAINTS, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 186–194, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10601-013-9153-3.
[12] J. C. Makinson, T. M. Schaerf, N. Wagner, B. P. Oldroyd, and M. Beekman, “Collective decision making in the red dwarf honeybee Apis florea: do the bees simply follow the flowers?,” Insectes Soc., vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 557–566, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s00040-017-0577-4.
[13] R. P. Mann, “Collective decision making by rational individuals,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., vol. 115, no. 44, pp. E10387–E10396, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1811964115.
[14] J. E. Herbert-Read, A. S. I. Wade, I. W. Ramnarine, and C. C. Ioannou, “Collective decision-making appears more egalitarian in populations where group fission costs are higher,” Biol. Lett., vol. 15, no. 12, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0556.
[15] T. Bosse, M. Hoogendoorn, M. C. A. Klein, J. Treur, C. N. van der Wal, and A. van Wissen, “Modelling collective decision making in groups and crowds: Integrating social contagion and interacting emotions, beliefs and intentions,” Auton. Agent. Multi. Agent. Syst., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 52–84, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s10458-012-9201-1.
[16] C. Sueur et al., “Collective decision-making and fission-fusion dynamics: a conceptual framework,” OIKOS, vol. 120, no. 11, pp. 1608–1617, Nov. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19685.x.
[17] S. D. Dionne, H. Sayama, and F. J. Yammarino, “Diversity and Social Network Structure in Collective Decision Making: Evolutionary Perspectives with Agent-Based Simulations,” Complexity, 2019, doi: 10.1155/2019/7591072.
[18] K. A. McHugh, F. J. Yammarino, S. D. Dionne, A. Serban, H. Sayama, and S. Chatterjee, “Collective decision making, leadership, and collective intelligence: Tests with agent-based simulations and a Field study,” Leadersh. Q., vol. 27, no. 2, SI, pp. 218–241, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.01.001.
[19] M. Zellner, C. Watkins, D. Massey, L. Westphal, J. Brooks, and K. Ross, “Advancing Collective Decision-Making Theory with Integrated Agent-Based Modeling and Ethnographic Data Analysis: An Example in Ecological Restoration,” JASSS-THE J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul., vol. 17, no. 4, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.18564/jasss.2605.
[20] H. Karami, “A Study of Problems and Problems of Group Decision Making,” Q. J. Manag. Account. Stud., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 324–337, 2017.
[21] Y. Khaluf, P. Simoens, and H. Hamann, “The Neglected Pieces of Designing Collective Decision-Making Processes,” Front. Robot. AI, vol. 6, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.3389/frobt.2019.00016.
[22] G. Carbone and I. Giannoccaro, “Model of human collective decision-making in complex environments,” Eur. Phys. J. B, vol. 88, no. 12, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1140/epjb/e2015-60609-0.
[23] Y. Xu, “Collective decision-making of voters with heterogeneous levels of rationality,” Public Choice, vol. 178, no. 1–2, pp. 267–287, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11127-018-00627-7.
[24] A. Van Deemen and A. Rusinowska, Collective decision making: Views from social choice and game theory, vol. 43. Springer Science & Business Media, 2010.
[25] S. Berg and J. Paroush, “Collective decision making in hierarchies,” Math. Soc. Sci., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 233–244, May 1998, doi: 10.1016/S0165-4896(97)00047-4.
[26] D. P. Slevin, L. W. Boone, E. M. Russo, and R. S. Allen, “CONFIDE: A collective decision-making procedure using confidence estimates of individual judgements,” Gr. Decis. Negot., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 179–194, Mar. 1998, doi: 10.1023/A:1008650524782.
[27] V. Cho and D. Chan, “How social influence through information adoption from online review sites affects collective decision making,” Enterp. Inf. Syst., doi: 10.1080/17517575.2019.1651398.
[28] R. B. Myerson, “Fundamentals of Social Choice Theory,” Quart. J. Polit. Sci., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 305–337, 2013, doi: 10.1561/100.00013006.
[29] Y. Fu, Y. Sui, H. Luo, and B. Han, “Application of Social Choice Theory to Modify the Value Measure of Health Systems,” Soc. Indic. Res., vol. 148, no. 3, pp. 1005–1019, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11205-019-02221-w.
[30] M. Iaryczower, X. Shi, and M. Shum, “Can Words Get in the Way? The Effect of Deliberation in Collective Decision Making,” J. Polit. Econ., vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 688–734, Apr. 2018.
پژوهش های نوین در تصمیم گیری
دوره 6، شماره 3
مهر 1400
صفحه 239-258

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار