[1] Abril, C. & Gimenez-Fernandez, E. M. (2024). Using gamification to overcome innovation process challenges: A literature review and future agenda. Technovation, 133, 103020. DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103020.
[2] Nandal, N., Kataria, A. & Dhingra, M. (2020). Measuring Innovation: Challenges and Best Practices. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29, 5, 1275-1285. http://sersc.org/journals/index.php/IJAST/article/view/8157.
[3] Qin, Y., Zhang, P., Deng, X. & Liao, G. (2023). Innovation efficiency evaluation of industrial technology research institute based on three-stage DEA. Expert Systems with Applications, 224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120004.
[4] An Q., Meng F., Xiong B., Wang Z. & Chen X. (2020). Assessing the relative efficiency of Chinese high-tech industries: a dynamic network data envelopment analysis approach. Annals of Operations Research, 290(1), 707-729. DOI: 10.1007/s10479-018-2883-2.
[5] Zuo, Z., Guo, H., Li, Y., Cheg, J. (2022). A two-stage DEA evaluation of Chinese mining industry technological innovation efficiency and eco-efficiency. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 94, 106762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106762.
[6] Alinezhad, A., Azar, A. & PourZarandi, M. (2019). Designing a Model for Predicting and Evaluating the Innovation Capacity of Knowledge-based Companies with a Neural-Adaptive Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS). Public Management Researches, 13, 47, 55-84. [In Persian]
[7] Azar, A., Mohebbi, H., Khadivar, A., & Heydari, A. (2017). A New Mathematical Model to Solve the Assignment Problems Caused by Multiple Heterogeneous Inputs and Outputs. Industrial Management Journal, 9(1), 1-18. [In Persian]
[8] Lin, R. & Li, Z. (2020). Directional distance based diversification super-efficiency DEA models for mutual funds. Omega, 97(C). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.08.003
[9] Mohebbi, H., Azar, A., Heidari, A., & Khadivar, A. (2019). Designing a Mathematical Model for Optimum Assignment in the Two-stage Green Supply Chain using Network Data Envelopment Analysis and Electrical Circuits. Industrial Management Studies, 17(54), 1-23. [In Persian]
[10] Kao C. & Hwang S. N. (2010). Efficiency measurement for network systems: IT impact on firm performance. Decision Support Systems, 48(3):437–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2009.06.002.
[11] Liang, L, Cook W. D. & Zhu J. (2008). DEA Models for Two-Stage Processes: Game Approach and Efficiency Decomposition. Naval Research Logistics, 55. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.20308.
[12] Halkos, G. E., Tzeremes, N. G. & Kourtzidis, S. A. (2014). A unified classification of two-stage DEA models. Surveys in Operations Research and Management Science, 19(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sorms.2013.10.001.
[13] Wang, C., Gopal, R. & Zionts, S. (1997). Use of data envelopment analysis in assessing information technology impact on firm performance. Annals of Operations Research, 73(1), 191–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sorms.2013.10.001.
[14] Seiford, L. M. & Zhu, J. (1999). Profitability and marketability of the top 55. U.S. Commercial Banks. Performance of Financial Institutions, 45(9), 1270–1288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.9.1270.
[15] Chen, Y. & Zhu, J. (2004). Measuring information technology’s indirect impact on firm performance. Information Technology & Management, 5(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ITEM.0000008075.43543.97.
[16] Castelli, L, Pesenti, R. & Ukovich, W. (2010). A classification of DEA models when the internal structure of the Decision Making Units is considered. Annals of Operations Research, 173(1), 207–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-008-0414-2.
[17] Kao, C., Hwang, S. N. (2008). Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: an application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research, 185(1), 418–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.11.041.
[18] Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., Li, N. & Zhu, J. (2009). Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA. European Journal of Operational Research,196(3),1170–1176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.011.
[19] Liang, L., Yang, F., Cook, W. D. & Zhu, J. (2006). DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation. Annals Operations Research, 145(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-006-0026-7.
[20] Chu, J., Wu, J., Chu, C. & Zhang, T. (2019). DEA-based fixed cost allocation in two-stage systems: Leader-follower and satisfaction degree bargaining game approaches. Omega, 94, 102054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.03.012.
[21] Wang, M., Huang, Y. & Li, D. (2021). Assessing the performance of industrial water resource utilization systems in China based on a two-stage DEA approach with game cross efficiency. Journal of Cleaner Production, 312, 127722. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127722.
[22] Wu, J., Xu, G., Zhu & Q. Zhang, C. (2021). Two-stage DEA models with fairness concern: Modelling and computational aspects. Omega, 105. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.omega.2021.102521.
[23] Yousefi, S., Jahangoshai Rezaee, M. & Solimanpur, M. (2019). Supplier selection and order allocation using two-stage hybrid supply chain model and game-based order price. Operational Research International Journal, 21, 553-588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-019-00456-6.
[24] Fang, L. (2020). Stage efficiency evaluation in a two-stage network data envelopment analysis model with weight priority. Omega, 97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.06.007.
[25] Yin, P., Chu, J., Wu, J., Ding, J., Yang, M. & Wang, Y. (2020). A DEA-based two-stage network approach for hotel performance analysis: An internal cooperation perspective. Omega, 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.02.004.
[26] Liu, H., Yang, G., Liu, X. & Song, Y. (2020). R&D performance assessment of industrial enterprises in China: A two-stage DEA approach. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2019.100753.
[27] Liu, X., Wu, X. & Zhang, W. (2024). A new DEA model and its application in performance evaluation of scientific research activities in the universities of Chinas double first-class initiative. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 92. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.seps. 2024.101839.
[28] Yu, A., Shi, Y., You, J. & Zhu, J. (2020). Innovation performance evaluation for high-tech companies using a dynamic network data envelopment analysis approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 292(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.10.011.
[29] Wang, Y., Pan, J., Pei, R., Yi, B. & Yang, G. (2020). Assessing the technological innovation efficiency of China's high-tech industries with a two-stage network DEA approach. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100810.
[30] Guan, J., Chen, K. (2012). Modeling the relative efficiency of national innovation systems. Research Policy, 41 (1), 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.001.
[31] Ma, J. (2015). A two-stage DEA model considering shared inputs and free intermediate measures. Expert Systems with Applications, 42, 4339-4347. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.eswa.2015.01.040.
[32] Lee, J., Kim, C. & Choi, G. (2019). Exploring data envelopment analysis for measuring collaborated innovation efficiency of small and medium-sized enterprises in Korea. European Journal of Operational Research, 278 (2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.08.044.
[33] Chiu, S. H. & Lin, T. (2019). Evaluating of Regional Knowledge Innovation System in China: An Economic Framework Based on Dynamic Slacks-based Approach. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 6(3), 141-149. DOI:10.13106/jafeb.2019.vol6.no3.141.
[34] Chun, D., Chung, Y., Woo, C., Seo, H. & Ko, H. (2015). Labor Union Effects on Innovation and Commercialization Productivity: An Integrated Propensity Score Matching and Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis. Sustainability, 7, 5120-5138. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su7055120.
[35] Xiong, X., Yang, G. L. & Guan, Z. (2018). Assessing R&D efficiency using a two-stage dynamics DEA model: A case study of research institutes in the Chines. Journal of Informetrics, 12, 784-805. DOI:10.1016/j.joi.2018.07.003.
[36] Wang, X., Liu, Y. & Chen, L. (2023). Innovation Efficiency Evaluation Based on a Two-Stage DEA Model With Shared-Input: A Case of Patent-Intensive Industry in China, in IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70(5), 1808-1822. https://doi.org/10.1109/ TEM.2021.3068989.
[37] Zhang, B., Luo, Y. & Chiu, Y. H. (2019). Efficiency evaluation of Chinas high-tech industry with a multi-activity network data envelopment analysis approach. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 66, 2-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2018.07.013.
[38] Mills, E. F. E. A., Zeng, K., Fangbiao, L., & Fangyan, L. (2021). Modeling innovation efficiency, its micro-level drivers, and its impact on stock returns. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 152, 111303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111303.
[39] Carayannis, E., Grigoroudis, E. & Goletsis, Y. (2016). A multilevel and multistage efficiency evaluation of innovation systems: A multiobjective DEA approach. Expert Systems With Applications, 62, 63-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.06.017.
[40] Li, Y., Chen, Y., Liang, L. & Xie, J. (2012). DEA models for extended two-stage network structures. Omega, 40, 611-618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2011.11.007.
[41] Liu, Z. & Lyu, J. (2020). Measuring the innovayion efficiency of the Chinese pharmaceutical industry based on a dynamic network DEA model. Applied Economics Letters, 27 (1), 35-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2019.1606402.
[42] Fang, Z., Gui, W., Han, Z. & Lan, L. (2024). The efficiency evaluation and influencing factor analysis of regional green innovation: a refined dynamic network slacks-based measure approach. Kybernetes, 53, 6, 2153-2193. https://doi.org/10.1108/ K-03-2022-0420.
[43] Chen, X., Liu, Z. & Zhu, Q. (2018). Performance evaluation of Chinas high-tech innovation process: Analysis based on the innovation value chain. Technovation, 74, 42-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.009.
