ارائه ترکیب QFD- سوارا و کوکوسو فازی شهودی جهت پیاده‌سازی استراتژی‌های تولید پایدار در فرایندهای تولیدی (مورد مطالعه شرکت سایپا)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

2 استادیار، گروه مدیریت صنعتی.، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

چکیده
پایداری از مفاهیم روز حوزه مدیریت است و توجه بسیاری از عالمان و شرکت‌های تولیدی را به خود جلب نموده است. در راستای اجرایی نمودن پایداری نیاز است که این مفهوم از بعد استراتژی درک شود و فعالیت‌های عملیاتی و تولیدی سازمان منطبق با آن هماهنگ شوند. در پژوهش حاضر، جهت پیاده‌سازی استراتژی‌های تولید پایدار اقدام به اولویت‌بندی فرایند‌ها شده است. این پژوهش از لحاظ هدف توسعه‌ای- کاربردی، از لحاظ ماهیت رویکرد ترکیبی، از لحاظ اجرا پیمایشی و از لحاظ جمع آوری داده توصیفی است. ابزار مورد استفاده برای گردآوری داده‌ها، مصاحبه و پرسشنامه است. در این پژوهش جهت تدوین استراتژی‌های تولید پایدار و پیاده‌سازی آن در فرایندهای تولیدی، سه مرحله ارائه شده است. در مرحله اول منطبق با مدل اسلک و لوئیس (2011) نه استراتژی‌های تولید پایدار برای شرکت سایپا ارائه گردیده است. در مرحله دوم با استفاده از سوارا فازی شهودی استراتژی‌های تولید پایدار وزن‌دهی گردیده‌اند که عملکرد سبز، کمترین ضایعات و بهره‌وری منابع بیشترین وزن را به دست‌ آورده‌اند. در مرحله سوم ماتریس روابط در ساختار QFD تشکیل و منطبق با تکنیک کوکوسو فازی شهودی فرایندهای اصلی شرکت سایپا اواویت‌دهی شده‌اند. اولویت فرایند اصلی در پیاده‌سازی استراتژی‌های تولید پایدار شرکت سایپا به ترتیب شامل 1) عملیات پرس و بدنه‌سازی، 2) عملیات مونتاژ، 3) سفارشات قطعات، 4) عملیات رنگ‌کاری، 5) لجستیک داخلی و 6)عملیات روتوش است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله English

Presenting a combination of QFD-Swara and Intuitive Fuzzy Cocoso to implement sustainable manufacturing strategies in manufacturing processes (case study of Saipa Company)

نویسندگان English

sajad ramezani 1
yaser daneshian 1
Masoud Kasaee 2
1 PHD student, Industrial Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Sustainability is one of the current management concepts that many companies are trying to implement. it is necessary to understand this concept from the perspective of strategy and coordinate the operational and manufacturing activities of the organization accordingly. To achieve sustainable manufacturing organizations must develop and implement a relevant strategy aligned with their processes. This research employs a descriptive approach, focusing on developmental-applicative goals, hybrid methodology, survey execution, and data collection. Data collection methods include interviews, checklists, and questionnaires. In this study, we explore sustainability within Saipa’s manufacturing strategies, presenting a three-stage process for formulation and implementation. In its initial stage, nine sustainable manufacturing strategies have been formulated for Saipa based on the model proposed by Slack and Lewis (2011). These strategies are designed to promote sustainability. In the second phase, Intuitionistic fuzzy logic was employed to assign weights to these strategies and green performance strategies, least waste and resource efficiency have had the most weight. In the third stage, the relationship matrix is formed in the QFD structure and Using the Intuitionistic fuzzy CoCoSo technique, Saipa company’s main processes are evaluated. The priority of the main process in implementing the sustainable production strategies of Saipa Company is 1) pressing and body building operations, 2) assembly operations, 3) parts orders, 4) painting operations, 5) internal logistics and 6) retouching operations.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Sustainable manufacturing strategy
QFD
Intuitionistic Fuzzy SWARA
Intuitive Fuzzy CoCoSo
manufacturing strategy
[1] Chatha, K.A. and Butt, I. (2015), “Themes of study in manufacturing strategy literature”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 604-698. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-07-2013-0328
[2] Sivaiah, P., Chakradhar, D., & Narayanan, R. G. (2023). Sustainable manufacturing strategies in machining. Sustainable Manufacturing Processes, 113–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-99990-8.00013-8
[3] Ali, S. S., Kaur, R., Persis, D. J., Saha, R., Pattusamy, M., & Sreedharan, V. R. (2020). Developing a hybrid evaluation approach for the low carbon performance on sustainable manufacturing environment. Annals of Operations Research, 324(1–2), 249–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03877-1
[4] Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development: Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.9774/gleaf.978-1-907643-44-6_12
[5] Macchi, M., Savino, M. and Roda, I. (2020) ‘Analysing the support of sustainability within the manufacturing strategy through multiple perspectives of different business functions’, Journal of Cleaner Production. Elsevier, 258, p. 120771. doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.120771.
[6] Ocampo, L. A. (2019). Applying fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS technique in identifying the content strategy of sustainable manufacturing for food production. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 21(5), 2225-2251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0129-8
[7] Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Foroughi, B., Tirkolaee, E. B., Asadi, S., & Amran, A. (2023). Industry 5.0 implications for inclusive sustainable manufacturing: An evidence-knowledge-based strategic roadmap. Journal of Cleaner Production, 417, 138023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138023
[8] Abdul Rashid, S. H., Evans, S., & Longhurst, P. (2008). A comparison of four sustainable manufacturing strategies. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 1(3), 214–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397030802513836 
[9] Worrell, E., Bernstein, L., Roy, J., Price, L., & Harnisch, J. (2009). Industrial energy efficiency and climatechange mitigation. Energy Efficiency, 2, 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-008-9032-8
[10] Bhat, F. A., & Parvez, S. (2024). Evaluating industry 4.0's sustainable performance and its impact on the manufacturing strategies. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology, doi: 13506501241252490.
[11] Khatri, J. K., & Metri, B. (2016). SWOT-AHP approach for sustainable manufacturing strategy selection: a case of Indian SME. Global Business Review, 17(5), 1211-1226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150916656693
[12] Jorge A. Vivares, William Sarache, Jorge E. Hurtado, (2018) "A maturity assessment model for manufacturing systems", Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-07-2017-0142
[13] Arafa, A. and ElMaraghy, W.H. (2011), “Manufacturing strategy and enterprise dynamic capability”, CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 60 No. 1, pp. 507-510. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-07-2017-0142
[14] Groover, M.P. (2010), Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing: Materials Processes, and Systems, 4th ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
[15] Mollazadeh Yazdani, B.,  Pooya, A. (2016). A longitudinal study of changes in manufacturing strategy in production firms of IRAN during horizon 2010-2016, Modern Research in Decision Making,  1(2), 171-193.  [in Persian]
[16] Dohale, Vishwas, Angappa Gunasekaran, Milind M. Akarte, and Priyanka Verma. (2020). “Twenty-five Years’ Contribution of “Benchmarking: an International Journal” to Manufacturing Strategy: A Scientometric Review.” Benchmarking: An International Journal 27 (10). doi: 2887–2908. doi:10.1108/BIJ-06-2020-0316.
[17] Dohale, V., Gunasekaran, A., Akarte, M. M., & Verma, P. (2022). 52 Years of manufacturing strategy: an evolutionary review of literature (1969–2021). International Journal of Production Research, 60(2), 569-594. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1971788
[18] Slack, N., & Lewis, M. (2011). Operations strategy. Pearson Education.
[19] Despeisse, M., Ball, P. D., Evans, S., & Levers, A. (2012). Industrial ecology at factory level-a conceptual model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 31, 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.027
[20] Ageron, B., Gunasekaran, A., & Spalanzani, A. (2012). Sustainable supply chain management. An empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics, 140, 168–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.04.007
[21] Ocampo, L. (2017). A probabilistic fuzzy analytic network process approach (PROFUZANP) in formulating sustainable manufacturing strategy infrastructural decisions under firm size influence. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 13(3), 158-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/17509653.2017.1345334
[22] De Alwis, A. M. L., De Silva, N., & Samaranayake, P. (2024). Industry 4.0-enabled sustainable manufacturing: current practices, barriers and strategies. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 31(6), 2061-2089. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-01-2023-0065
[23] Saunders , Mark ; Lewis, Philip; Thornhill, Adrian (2009). Research methods for business students. Fifth edition. Harlow: Pearson Education
[24] Mishra, A. R., Rani, P., Pandey, K., Mardani, A., Streimikis, J., Streimikiene, D., & Alrasheedi, M. (2020). Novel multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy SWARA–COPRAS approach for sustainability evaluation of the bioenergy production process. Sustainability, 12(10), 4155. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104155
[25] Fazli, S., jamaati tafti, H. (2017). Preprocessing Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Using Data Mining (Case Study: Selection of third party logistic in outsourcing warranty services of an electronic facilities company). Modern Research in Decision Making, 2(3), 215-239.  [in Persian]
[26] Garg, H., Vimala, J., Rajareega, S., Preethi, D., & Perez-Dominguez, L. (2022). Complex intuitionistic fuzzy soft SWARA-COPRAS approach: An application of ERP software selection. AIMS Math, 7(4), 5895-5909. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022327
[27] loghman estarki, S.,  Yazdani, H, R., Hakim, A. (2019), The design of Strategy implementation Framework Based on IT Capabilities (Case study: An Iranian bank), Management Research in Iran, 23(3), 75-103. [in Persian]
[28] akbari, M., Ghazinoory, S. (2011). Translating Strategy into Action; A Dynamic QFD Application with Third – Generation Balanced Scorecard Approach, Management Research in Iran, , 15(3), 43-59.  20.1001.1.2322200.1390.15.3.2.6 [in Persian]
[29] Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Kazimieras Zavadskas, E., & Turskis, Z. (2019). A combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems. Management Decision, 57(9), 2501-2519. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-05-2017-0458
[30] Tripathi, D. K., Nigam, S. K., Rani, P., & Shah, A. R. (2023). New intuitionistic fuzzy parametric divergence measures and score function-based CoCoSo method for decision-making problems. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 6(1), 535-563. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame0318102022t