[1] Maleki, M. Ghasemi, A. (2015). Paradimic Analysis of Operation Research Techniques, Darolfonon Pub, Tehran. (In Persian)
[2] Ghasemi, A.(2015). Decision making in Business, Jahad Daneshgahi, Tehran. (In Persian)
[3] Rosenhead, J., & Mingers, J. (2001). Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited (translated by Azar and Anvari). John Wiley and Sons. (In Persian)
[4] Haleh, H. and Hamidi, A. (2011). A fuzzy MCDM model for allocating orders to suppliers in a supply chain under uncertainty over a multi-period time horizon. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(8): 9076-9083.
[5] Danaeifard, H. Azar, A. Alvani, M.(2010). Quantative Method of Research, Sffar pub, Tehran. (In Persian).
[6] Hoseinzadeh, M. Mehregan, M. Amiri, M.(2015). Designing a Framwork by Usisng Operation Research Multi Methodology by General Morphological Analysis, Industerial Management Perspective, 11(1), 69-81. (In Persian)
[7] Azar, A., Khosravani, F., & Jalali, R. (2013). Soft Operational Research. Industrial Management Publication, Tehran,(In Persian).
[8] Thurmond, V. (2001), the point of triangulation. Journal of nursing scholarship 33(3), 253-258.
[9] Ic, Y. (2012). An experimental design approach using TOPSIS method for the selection of computer-integrated manufacturing technologies. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 28(2): 245-256.
[10] Sarmad, Z., Bazargan, A., & Hejazi, E. (2004). Research methods in behavioral sciences. Tehran: Agah Publication, 132-7.(In Persian)
[11] Saremi, M. Hoseini, M. Mohaghar, A. Heidari, A. (2010). Proposing a Qualitative Model for Competitive Advantage in High Tech Industries. Industerial Management, 1(3), 67-81.(In Persian)
[12] Mosleh shirazi, A. Ranaei, H. Iman, M. Tajic, M.(2016). Systematic Multimethodology, New Approach in Management Researches. Methodology of Social Science and Humanities Journal. 22(87)7-32. (In Persian)
[13] Velasquez, M., & Hester, P. T. (2013). An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods. International Journal of Operations Research, 10, 56-66.
[14] Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Kildienė, S. (2014). State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods. Technological and economic development of economy, 20(1), 165-179.
[15] Shahin, A. SalehzadehR. Ghandehari, M. (2012). Proposing an Integrated Model of Clustring, AHP and Kano Approaches for Service Recommendation with a Case study in Saman bank of Qom, Management Researches in Iran 16(1), 73-91. (In Persian)
[16] Ghasemi, A. et. Al. (2012). AHP or FAHP that is the question (The Case of Department of., wulfenia, 19(9), 143-161.
[17] Ghasemi, A. Ebrahimi, S.A. (2014). Paradimic Analysis of Operation Research Techniques, International Confrence on Management, Tehran. (In Persian)
[18] Esogbue, A., Theologidu, M., and Guo, K. (1992). On the application of fuzzy sets theory to the optimal flood control problem arising in water resources systems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 48(2): 155-172.
[19] Malek, A. Dabbaghi, A.(2013). Basis of Grey Systems Tehory, Termeh Pub, Tehran. (In Persian).
[20] Frost, N., Nolas, S. M., Brooks-Gordon, B., Esin, C., Holt, A., Mehdizadeh, L., & Shinebourne, P. (2010). Pluralism in qualitative research: The impact of different researchers and qualitative approaches on the analysis of qualitative data. Qualitative research, 10(4), 441-460.
[21] Amiri, M. (2010). Project selection for oil-fields development by using the AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(9): 6218-6224.
[22] Wang, T. (2012). The interactive trade decision-making research: An application of novel hybrid MCDM model. Economic Modelling, 29(3): 926-935.
[23]Khadivar, A. Azar, A. Mohebbian, F.(2017). Product pricing in two-echelon supply chain using game theory in intuitionistic fuzzy environment, Industrial Management Studies, 4(43), 1-45.
[24] Liu, X., Chai, T., Wang, W., & Liu, W. (2007). Approaches to the representations and logic operations of fuzzy concepts in the framework of axiomatic fuzzy set theory I. Information Sciences, 177(4), 1007-1026.
[25] Kim, Y., Chung, E., Jun, S., and Kim, S. (2013). Prioritizing the best sites for treated wastewater instream use in an urban watershed using fuzzy TOPSIS. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 73(2013): 23-32.
[26] Lin, Y. H., Lee, P. C., & Ting, H. I. (2008). Dynamic multi-attribute decision-making model with grey number evaluations. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(4), 1638-1644.
[27] Ju-Long, Deng. (1982)Control problems of grey systems. Systems & Control Letters 1(5): 288-294.
[28] Liu, S., & Lin, Y. (2006). Grey information: theory and practical applications. Springer Science & Business Media.
[29] Podvezko, V. (2011). The comparative analysis of MCDA methods SAW and COPRAS. Inzinerine-Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 22(2): 134-146.
[30] Okeola, O., and Sule, B. (2012). Evaluation of management alternatives for urban water supply system using Multi-criteria Decision Analysis. Journal of King Saud University – Engineering Sciences, 24(1): 19-24.
[31] Leung, P., Muraoka, J., Nakamoto, S., and Pooley, S. (1998). Evaluating fisheries management options in Hawaii using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Fisheries Research, 36(2-3): 171-183.
[32] Li, H. and Sun, J. (2008). Ranking-order case-based reasoning for financial distress prediction. Knowledge-Based Systems, 21(8): 868-878.
[33] Noorul Haq, A., & Kannan, G. (2007). A hybrid normalised multi criteria decision making for the vendor selection in a supply chain model. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 8(5-6), 601-622.
[34] Ambrasaite, I., Barfod, M., and Salling, K (2011). MCDA and risk analysis in transport infrastructure appraisals: The Rail Baltica case. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 20, 944-953.
[35] Hemmati, M. Abbasi, S. (2015). Representing a Multi-Step Technique of the Common weights and TOPSIS in order to Ranking of Units, Modern Researches in Decision Making, 1(2), 193-215.
[36] Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative science quarterly, 602-611.
[37] Johnson, R. B. (1997). Examining the validity structure of qualitative research. Education, 118(2), 282-292.