[1] Benayoun, R., Montgolfier, J., Tergny, J., Laritchev, O. (1971). Linear programming with multiple objective functions: step method (STEM). Mathematical Programming 1, 366-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01584098
[2] Jeong, I.J., Kim, W.J. (2005). D-STEM: a modified step method with desirability function concept. Computers & Operations Research, 32, 3175-3190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2004.05.006
[3] Xevi, E., Khan, S. (2007). A STEP Method based multiple objective methodology for irrigation water management to model preferences and tradeoffs. International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, 149-155. DOI:10.13140/2.1.4489.8086
[4] Lee, P., Kang, S. (2018). An Interactive Multi objective Optimization Approach to Supplier Selection and Order Allocation Problems Using the Concept of Desirability. Information 2018, 9, 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/info9060130
[5] Teghem Jr, J., Dufrane, D., Thauvoye, M., Kunsch, P. (1986). Strange: An interactive method for multi objective linear programming under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 26, 65-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(86)90160-8
[6] Mollaghasemi, M., W.Evans, G. (1994). Multicriteria Design of Manufacturing Systems Through Simulation Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, And Cybernetics, Vol. 24, No. 9. DOI: 10.1109/21.310518
[7] Al-Agha, A. (2015). A multi-objective linear programming model for national planning. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, Vol. III, No. 4.
[8] Nadershahi, M., Safi.S, A.D., Tavakkoli moghaddam, R. (2019). Development of a Genetic Algorithm-based Decision Neural Network for the Preference Assessment in Multi-objective Decision-Making Problems. Journal of Modern Research in Decision Making (Scientific Research Quarterly), 4, 3, 127-153. [in Persian] DOR: 20.1001.1.24766291.1398.4.3.6.4
[9] Devi, S., Madhusmita Nayak, M., Patnaik, S. (2021). A Study on Decision Making by Estimating Preferences Using Utility Function and Indifference Curve. Intelligent and Cloud Computing, Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies 194, 373-386. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5971-6_41
[10] Belenson, Sh., C.Kapur, K. (1971). An algorithm for solving multi criterion linear programming problems with examples. Operational Research Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/3008036
[11] Wallenius, J. (1975). Comparative Evaluation of Some Interactive Approaches to Multi criterion Optimization. Management Science, 21(12), 1387-1396. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.21.12.1387
[12] Nijkamp, P., Rietveld, P. (1976). Multi-objective programming models New Ways in Regional Decision-Making. Regional science and Urban Economics, 6, 253-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(76)90002-8
[13] Dinkelbach, W., Isermann, H. (1980). Resource allocation of an academic department in the presence of multiple criteria. Computer & Operational Research, 7, 99-106.
[14] Masud, A., Hwang, C.L. (1981). Interactive Sequential Goal Programming. Operational Research, 32, 391-400. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1981.76
[15] Evans, G. (1984). An Overview of Techniques for Solving Multi objective Mathematical Programs. Management Science, 3 30(11), 1268-1282. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.11.1268
[16] Brockhoff, K. (1985). Experimental test of MCDM algorithms in a modular approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 22, 159-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(85)90224-3
[17] Michalowski, W. (1987). Evaluation Of a Multiple Criteria Interactive Programming Approach: An Experiment. Information Systems and Operational Research, vol. 25, No. 2. https://doi.org/10.1080/03155986.1987.11732036
[18] Gardiner, L., Steuer, R. (1994). Unified interactive multiple objective programming. European Journal of Operational Research, 74, 391-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)90219-4
[19] Park, K., Kim, K.J. (2005). Optimizing multi-response surface problems: How to use multi-objective optimization techniques. IIE Transactions, 37, 523-532. https://doi.org/10.1080/07408170590928992
[20] Pokharel, Sh. (2008). A two-objective model for decision making in a supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 111, 378-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.01.006
[21] Roostaee, R., Izadikhah, M., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F. (2012). An Interactive Procedure to Solve Multi-Objective Decision-Making Problem: An Improvement to STEM Method. Journal of Applied Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/324712
[22] Mohanty, R.R., Paul, J.C., Panigrahi, B. (2015). An interactive multi-objective linear programming approach for watershed planning- a case study. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 14(1), 63-68. https://doi.org/10.52151/jae2016534.1613
[23] Amiri, M., Azizmohammadi, M., Hoseinnezhadi, M. (2014) Application of multi-level, multi-objective mathematical model to determine the optimal level of effective quality factors in plastic injection quality and using fuzzy dual response surface methodology (Case Study: Movable arm rest Teflon Bush for bus seat). Journal of Management Research in Iran, 18, 2, 1-24. [in Persian] DOR: 20.1001.1.2322200.1393.18.2.1.4
[24] Peric, T., Babic, Z., Matejas, J. (2018). Comparative analysis of application efficiency of two iterative multi objective linear programming methods (MP method and STEM method). CEJOR, 26, 565-583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-018-0543-x
[25] Razuminkov, S.V. (2020). Application of the STEM Method in the Multi-Criteria Task of Linear Programming in the Design of a Cloud Technology Development Strategy. 2020 International Russian Automation Conference. DOI:10.1109/RusAutoCon49822.2020.9208066
[26] Henriques, C., Luque, M., Marcenaro-Gutierrez, O. (2020). Coupling distinct MOLP interactive approaches with a novel DEA hybrid model. International Transactions in Operational Research, 00, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12879
[27] Mosa, M., Azar, A., Rajabzadeh.G, A. (2021) A bi-objective MILP model for lot sizing and scheduling problem: possibilistic fuzzy goal programming approach. Journal of Modern Research in Decision Making (Scientific Research Quarterly), 6, 2, 181-212. DOR: 20.1001.1.24766291.1400.6.2.8.8
[28] Omid, A., Azar, A., Dehghan Nayeri, M, & Moghbel, A. (2021) Developing a network Data Envelopment Analysis approach to compare the environmental efficiency of active industries in Tehran. Journal of Management Research in Iran, 25, 3, 193-216. [in Persian] DOR: 20.1001.1.2322200.1400.25.3.8.2
[29] Chen, L., Miettinen, K., Xin, B., Ojalehto, V. (2022) Comparing reference point based interactive multi objective Optimization methods without a human decision maker. Journal of Global Optimization, 85, 757-788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-022-01230-3
[30] Fathollahi-Fard, A.M, Guangdong, T., Hue, K., Yapjng, F., Kuan Yew, W. (2023) Efficient Multi-objective Metaheuristic Algorithm for Sustainable Harvest Planning Problem. Computers & Operations Research, 158, 106304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2023.106304
[31] Corrente, S, Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Slowinski, R. (2024) Explainable interactive evolutionary Mult objective optimization. Omega, 122, 102925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2023.102925
[32] Zhou, X., Tan, W., Sun, Y., Huang, T., Yang, Ch. (2024) Multi-objective optimization and decision making for integrated energy system using STA and fuzzy TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 240, 122539. DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122539
[33] Ciaburro, G. (2020). Hands-On Simulation Modeling with Python. Packt Publishing Ltd, pp 6.
[34] Romero, C., Rehman, T. (2003). Multi criteria analysis for agricultural decisions. Developments in agricultural economics,11, 81-88.
